Carbon 14 dating dinosaur bones Jerking off web cam chat sites
(Mark Armitage) was subsequently fired from his position at California State University Northridge.He has sued the university, claiming that he was fired because of his religious views. Alexander Cherkinsky at the University of Georgia’s Center for Applied Isotope Studies for dating via the carbon-14 dating method.The half-life of carbon-14 is 5,730 years, which means it takes that long for half of any initial amount amount of carbon-14 to decay.A FLY IN THE OINTMENT – WHAT WERE THE INITIAL AMOUNTS?While this is an interesting result, it is not as interesting as I would like it to be.I wanted the soft tissue that was found in the fossil to be dated, but it was not.This The theory predicts that the test results should say that the bones are at least 50,000 years old.
They can measure the ratios of carbon-14 to carbon-12 in the atmosphere today. March 4, 1949] But if there were any kind of recent catastrophe — such as a global flood, for example — the atmospheric ratios of the two carbon atoms would probably have changed over time, and would still be changing even now.I had presented some carbon-14 dates of dinosaur bones during the debate, and in his rebuttal, the evolutionist (Dr.Robert Martin) said that the dates were obviously wrong because of contamination. He specifically said that carbon-14 dating is accurate to within 100 years or so.Evolutionists “know” the dates are wrong because they believe the earth is much, much older than what God tells us it is. “Carbon dating dinosaur bones is ludicrous, and the fact they yielded numbers is meaningless.” Another remark noted in the article was “. An objective scientist would explore the discrepancies produced by the dating methods. If dinosaur bones are not 65 million years old, then this poses serious problems to the entire modern science guild who has built its house upon the sandy shores of evolution theory. Another common “explanation” — other than contamination — though it’s really just a theory, is that the carbon-14 that exists in the bones was produced by millions of years of uranium and thorium decaying underground and injecting the bones with carbon-14 isotopes produced during the decay process.Seek and ye shall find: creationists boldly go where no evolutionists have gone before.In the 1970’s, similar ages were gathered for other materials presumed to be very old, such as coal and sabre-toothed tiger remains.Note that the results don’t really tell us anything except that there is some quantity of carbon-14 in the bones.During the Q&A session with the audience that followed the debate, one person asked how reliable dating methods are. I chimed in with, “Well, unless it is dinosaur fossils being dated. Mark Hollis Armitage and Kevin Lee Anderson, “Soft sheets of fibrillar bone from a fossil of the supraorbital horn of the dinosaur Triceratops horridus,” , 115(6):603–608, 2013 Return to Text 2. Alexander Cherkinsky, “Radiocarbon Analysis Report,” The University of Georgia Center for Applied Isotope Studies, August 14, 2012. Scientists who are Christians who adhere to a six-day creation would recognize that it’s expected that there would be some carbon-14 in the bones because not enough time has passed for all of it to decay (since the age of the earth is less than 2 half-lives of carbon-14).But since the age predicted by the method is wrong (i.e.